4.7 Review

Use of maternal GHb concentration to estimate the risk of congenital anomalies in the offspring of women with prepregnancy diabetes

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 30, Issue 7, Pages 1920-1925

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc07-0278

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE - We sought to determine the absolute risk of having a congenital anomaly in relation to periconceptional GHb concentration among women with prepregnancy diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Two reviewers independently retrieved all cohort studies through a systematic literature search between January 1985 and May 2006. For each study, the absolute risk of having a pregnancy affected by a major or minor structural anomaly (diagnosed either antenatally or up to 28 days after conception) was calculated according to the number of SDs of GHb above the mean for nondiabetic, nonpregnant control subjects. A multilevel logistic-normal model was used to pool the data, which were expressed in tabular and graphic formats. RESULTS - in seven cohort studies, there were 117 anomalies among 1,977 pregnancies. At a periconceptional GHb concentration 0 SD above normal, the absolute risk of a pregnancy affected by a congenital anomaly was similar to 2% (95% CI 0.0-4.4). At 2 SD above normal, the risk was 3% (0.4-6. 1), and at 8 SD it was similar to 10% (2.3-17.8). For each 1-SD unit increase in GHb, the associated risk of a congenital malformation increased by an odds ratio of 1.2 (95% Cl 1. 1-1.4). The risk in relation to AlC followed the same pattern. CONCLUSIONS - Using data from a limited number of published studies, a practical aid was developed to optimize use of the GHb and AlC concentrations for estimating the absolute risk of a congenital anomaly in the offspring of women with prepregnancy diabetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available