4.6 Article

Impaired trafficking of Gnai2+/- and Gnai2-/- T lymphocytes:: Implications for T cell movement within lymph nodes

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 179, Issue 1, Pages 439-448

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.1.439

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Signals generated by the engagement of chemoattractants with their cognate receptors orchestrate lymphocyte movements into and out of lymphoid organs and sites of inflammation. Yet, the role of chemokines in organizing lymphocyte movements in lymphoid organs is controversial. Recent evidence suggests that the extensive network of fibroblastic reticular cells within. the T cell areas helps guide T cells. The expression of adhesion molecules and chemokines by fibroblastic reticular cells most likely facilitates their influence on T cell movements. Consistent with this hypothesis, CD4 T cells with defective chemokine receptor signaling move very differently within lymph nodes than do normal cells. For the imaging studies, we used CD4 T cells prepared from Gnai2(-/-) mice, which lack G(alpha i2), expression. We first demonstrate that CD4 as well as CD8 T cells from these mice are markedly defective in chemokine receptor signaling. Gnai2(-/-) T cells have profound defects in chemokine-induced intracellular calcium mobilization, chemotaxis, and homing, whereas Gnai2(+/-) T cells exhibit modest defects. Intravital imaging revealed that within the inguinal lymph nodes Gnai2(-/-) CD4 T accumulate at the cortical ridge, poorly accessing the lymph node paracortex. They also lack the customary amoeboid-like cell movements and active membrane projections observed with normal CD4 T cells. These results demonstrate the importance of G(alpha i2) for T lymphocyte chemokine receptor signaling and argue that local chemoattractants regulate the movement of CD4 T cells in lymph nodes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available