4.3 Article

Eubacterial diversity of activated biomass from a common effluent treatment plant

Journal

RESEARCH IN MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 158, Issue 6, Pages 494-500

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2007.04.004

Keywords

16S rRNA gene; bacterial diversity; common effluent treatment plant (CETP); unidentified bacteria

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A common effluent treatment plant (CETP) is a biological wastewater treatment facility that receives wastewater from different industries. The activated biomass in the CETP survives on a wide range of chemicals with no fixed wastewater characteristics. We carried out a diversity analysis of this activated biomass using culture as well as culture-independent techniques. Using culture-based techniques, strains belonging to 26 different genera from the phyla Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Firmicutes were isolated. The gamma-proteobacteria was the best represented class, with 36.5% of the isolates. Bacterial diversity was also analyzed culture-independently by means of sequence determination of cloned 16S rRNA genes. Twenty-one different genera from the phyla Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Planctomycetes and Bacteroidetes were identified. The total diversity of the activated biomass was composed of members of five known phyla, represented by 37 genera, with the Proteobacteria constituting the most abundant phylum detected. However, a very large fraction of the diversity represented a hitherto unidentified bacterial population. More than half (50.2%) of the 16S rDNA clones represented unidentified non-culturable bacteria, underlining the vast untapped diversity of CETP communities. Our results also indicate that both culture-based and culture-independent techniques should be combined to cover the microbial diversity of complex ecosystems. (C) 2007 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available