4.7 Article

Sweet taste preferences are partly genetically determined: identification of a trait locus on chromosome 16

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 86, Issue 1, Pages 55-63

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/86.1.55

Keywords

family study; food preferences; genetic linkage; heritability; human genetics; sweet taste

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS37675] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Humans have an innate preference for sweet taste, but the degree of liking for sweet foods varies individually. Objective: The proportion of inherited sweet taste preference was studied. A genome-wide linkage analysis was performed to locate the underlying genetic elements in the genome. Design: A total of 146 subjects (32% men, 68% women) aged 18-78 y from 26 Finnish families evaluated the intensity and pleasantness of 3 suprathreshold solutions of sucrose (3.0%, 7.5%, and 18.75%) and plain water and the intensity of filter paper impregnated with 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP). The subjects also reported the pleasantness and the use frequency of 5 sweet foods (chocolate, candy, ice cream, sweet desserts, and sweet pastry) and completed a food-behavior questionnaire that measured their craving for sweet foods. Results: Of the chemosensory functions, the pleasantness rating of the strongest (18.75%) sucrose solution and the intensity rating of PROP yielded the highest heritability estimates (41% and 66%, respectively). The pleasantness and the use frequency of sweet foods (both variables calculated as a mean of ratings for 5 food items) and the craving for sweet foods showed significant heritability (40%, 50%, and 31%, respectively). A logarithm of odds score of 3.5 (P = 0.00003) was detected for use frequency of sweet foods on chromosome 16p11.2 (marker D16S753). Conclusions: Sweet taste preferences are partly inherited. Chromosome 16p11.2 may harbor genetic variations that affect the consumption of sweet foods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available