4.6 Article

Effects of hyperglycemia on the cerebrovascular response to rhythmic handgrip exercise

Journal

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00045.2007

Keywords

cerebral autoregulation; cardiac output; human; vascular tone

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (CA) is challenged by exercise and may become less effective when exercise is exhaustive. Exercise may increase arterial glucose concentration, and we evaluated whether the cerebrovascular response to exercise is affected by hyperglycemia. The effects of a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (EU) and hyperglycemic clamp (HY) on the cerebrovascular (CVRI) and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) responses were evaluated in seven healthy subjects at rest and during rhythmic handgrip exercise. Transfer function analysis of the dynamic relationship between beat-to-beat changes in mean arterial pressure and middle cerebral artery (MCA) mean blood flow velocity (V-mean) was used to assess dynamic CA. At rest, SVRI decreased with HY and EU (P < 0.01). CVRI was maintained with EU but became reduced with HY [11% (SD 3); P < 0.01], and MCA Vmean increased (P < 0.05), whereas brain catecholamine uptake and arterial Pco(2) did not change significantly. HY did not affect the normalized low-frequency gain between mean arterial pressure and MCA Vmean or the phase shift, indicating maintained dynamic CA. With HY, the increase in CVRI associated with exercise was enhanced (19 +/- 7% vs. 9 +/- 7%; P < 0.05), concomitant with a larger increase in heart rate and cardiac output and a larger reduction in SVRI (22 +/- 4% vs. 14 +/- 2%; P < 0.05). Thus hyperglycemia lowered cerebral vascular tone independently of CA capacity at rest, whereas dynamic CA remained able to modulate cerebral blood flow around the exercise-induced increase in MCA Vmean. These findings suggest that elevated blood glucose does not explain that dynamic CA is affected during intense exercise.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available