4.5 Article

Development of a useful technique to discriminate anterior cruciate ligament cells and mesenchymal stem cells - The application of cell electrophoresis

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
Volume 82A, Issue 1, Pages 230-237

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31163

Keywords

mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs); anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) cells; cell electrophoresis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can differentiate into multiple nonhematopoietic cell lineages, including osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and ligament cells. The purpose of this study is to identify the difference between MSCs and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) cells for the application of distinguishing these two cells during the process of MSCs differentiating into ACL cells. Although culture of MSCs and ACL cells have been studied extensively, it was found that these two cells could not be distinguished from their appearance, expression of surface antigens (including CD105, CD34, CD45, CD29, CD44, and CD71), alpha-smooth muscle actin, and mRNAs for type I collagen, type III collagen, and tenascin-C, based on a series of traditional methods for cell identification. Cell electrophoresis, measuring the electrophoretic mobility (EPM) of cells, was proposed to investigate the discrepancy in surface charge properties of MSCs and ACL cells. Surprisingly, the EPM value of MSCs is significantly greater than that of ACL cells (p < 0.001). Although cell electrophoresis cannot determine the specific surface protein, it can reflect the net surface charge density of cell membrane, which can be influenced by the dissociation of functional groups of peripheral membrane proteins. Therefore, it is suggested that cell electrophoresis, while simple and cheap in manipulation, can serve as a useful research tool to assist in identification of MSCs differentiating into ACL cells. (c) 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available