4.8 Article

Simultaneous Analysis of Glycosylated and Sialylated Prostate-Specific Antigen Revealing Differential Distribution of Glycosylated Prostate-Specific Antigen Isoforms in Prostate Cancer Tissues

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 83, Issue 1, Pages 240-245

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac102319g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, the Early Detection and Research Network (NIH/NCI/EDRN) [U01CA152813]
  2. Patrick C. Walsh Prostate Cancer Research Fund
  3. United States Department of Defense [PC081386]
  4. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [U01CA152813] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aberrant protein glycosylation has been shown to be associated with disease progression and can be potentially useful as a biomarker if disease-specific glycosylation can be identified. However, high-throughput quantitative analysis of protein glycosylation derived from clinical specimens presents technical challenges due to the typically high complexity of biological samples. In this study, a mass spectrometry-based analytical method was developed to measure different glycosylated forms of glycoproteins from complex biological samples by coupling glycopeptide extraction strategy for specific glycosylation with selected reaction monitoring (SRM). Using this method, we monitored glycosylated and sialylated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in prostate cancer and noncancer tissues. Results of this study demonstrated that the relative abundance of glycosylated PSA isoforms were not correlated with total PSA protein levels measured in the same prostate cancer tissue samples by clinical immunoassay. Furthermore, the sialylated PSA was differentially distributed in cancer and noncancer tissues. These data suggest that differently glycosylated isoforms of glycoproteins can be quantitatively analyzed and may provide unique information for clinically relevant studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available