4.8 Article

DNA Aptamers Binding to Multiple Prevalent M-Types of Streptococcus pyogenes

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 83, Issue 10, Pages 3640-3647

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac200575e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Alberta Health and Wellness
  3. Alberta Water Research Institute
  4. Canadian Water Network
  5. Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper describes the selection of high affinity DNA aptamers binding to multiple M-types of the pathogenic species Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A Streptococcus or GAS). Unlike common aptamer selection techniques that use purified molecules of a monoclonal cell population as targets, this work has achieved the selection of aptamers against the various M-types of S. pyogenes. Cell mixtures containing equal numbers of the 10 most prevalent S. pyogenes M-types were incubated with 80-nucleotide DNA libraries, centrifuged, and washed to separate cell-bound from unbound DNA sequences. The DNA bound to the cells was amplified using the polymerase chain reaction, and the amplicons were tested for their binding to the target cells. The amplicons were also used as new DNA libraries for subsequent rounds of selection. Cloning, sequencing, and subsequent analysis of selected aptamers showed that they bind preferentially to GAS over other common and related bacteria. Resultant DNA aptamers showed strong and preferential binding to GAS, including the 10 most prevalent GAS M-types and another 10 minor M-types tested. Estimated K(d) values were in the range of 4 to 86 nM. Two aptamers, 20A24P and 15A3P (with estimated binding dissociation constants of 9 and 10 nM, respectively), are particularly promising. These aptamers could potentially be used to improve the detection of GAS, a pathogen that is the causative agent of many infectious diseases, most notably strep throat.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available