4.6 Article

IGR J16194-2810: a new symbiotic X-ray binary

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 470, Issue 1, Pages 331-337

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077509

Keywords

astrometry; stars : binaries : general; X-rays : binaries; stars : neutron; stars : individual : IGR J16194-2810

Funding

  1. STFC [PP/D001013/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/D001013/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

yWe here report on the multiwavelength study which led us to the identification of X-ray source IGR J16194-2810 as a new Symbiotic X-ray Binary (SyXB), that is, a rare type of Low Mass X-ray Binary (LMXB) composed of a M-type giant and a compact object. Using the accurate X-ray position allowed by Swift/ XRT data, we pinpointed the optical counterpart, a M2III star. Besides, the combined use of the spectral information afforded by XRT and INTEGRAL/ IBIS shows that the 0.5-200 keV spectrum of this source can be described with an absorbed Comptonization model, usually found in LMXBs and, in particular, in SyXBs. No long-term (days to months) periodicities are detected in the IBIS data. The time coverage afforded by XRT reveals shot-noise variability typical of accreting Galactic X-ray sources, but is not good enough to explore the presence of X-ray short-term (seconds to hours) oscillations in detail. By using the above information, we infer important parameters for this source such as its distance (similar to 3.7 kpc) and X-ray luminosity (similar to 1.4 x 10(35) erg s(-1) in the 0.5-200 keV band), and we give a description for this system (typical of SyXBs) in which a compact object (possibly a neutron star) accretes from the wind of its M-type giant companion. We also draw some comparisons between IGR J16194-2810 and other sources belonging to this subclass, finding that this object resembles SyXBs 4U 1700+ 24 and 4U 1954+ 31.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available