4.2 Article

Lower urinary tract symptoms after radical perineal prostatectomy

Journal

JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 7, Pages 534-539

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hym058

Keywords

prostate cancer; radical perineal prostatectomy; lower urinary tract symptoms

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To clarify the impact of radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP) on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Methods: A total of 117 patients with a median age of 69 years who underwent RPP alone between August 2002 and August 2005 were included in the study. We measured LUTS on the basis of the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and IPSS quality of life (QOL) questionnaire before, and 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. Results: The overall mean total IPSS and IPSS QOL score decreased over time after RPP and was significantly reduced at 12 months after surgery. The decrease of the score was more prominent and rapid in patients with moderate to severe symptoms (IPSS >= 8), whereas in those with no or only mild symptoms (IPSS <= 7), the score did not change significantly after RPP. When the patients were divided into groups with baseline scores of 0-1 and 2-5 for each of the seven composites of the IPSS, scores for the 2-5 group improved significantly after RPP in all composites, whereas the 0-1 group had significantly worse scores for voiding frequency and nocturia. No significant change was noted in any of the other five composites. Conclusion: This longitudinal study shows that RPP is significantly beneficial for moderate to severe LUTS, but also has adverse effects on voiding frequency and nocturia in some men with no or mild symptoms. This information is important when counseling patients about treatment options for localized prostate cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available