4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Equilibrium and non-equilibrium structures in complex food systems

Journal

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
Volume 21, Issue 5-6, Pages 674-682

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2006.08.019

Keywords

emulsions; double emulsions; high internal phase emulsions (HIPE); protein networks; gels; interfaces; liquid crystals; mesophases; self-assembly

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The physics ruling the macroscopic behaviour of foods is discussed in a few selected examples in which the equilibrium/nonequilibrium nature can be directly related to the typical length scale of the food structure and the specific interaction strength, the latter describing the decrease in specific free energy (e.g., per mole of species or per single event) when going from a non-equilibrium to the equilibrium configuration. Liquid-crystalline phases in foods, such as those based on self-assembled lipids and water, are discussed as an example of equilibrium system, in which low correlation length scales (similar to nm) enable very-short times to re-organize molecules into equilibrium configurations. High internal phase emulsions and dry foams where length scales are very large (similar to 10(1)similar to 10(4) mu m), are discussed as a typical example of non-equilibrium system, which however, can be stable for long times owing to the high free energy barrier and the large correlation lengths. Finally double emulsion systems are considered as an example where both interaction strength and correlation lengths have intermediate values. This allows tuning morphologies and making equilibrium behaviour to prevail over non-equilibrium by suitably tailoring the energetic interactions. In particular the case of osmotic pressure in the water phase of water/oil/water double emulsions is discussed as a viable route to control interaction strength in complex food systems. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available