4.5 Article

Critical contacts between the eukaryotic initiation factor 2B (eIF2B) catalytic domain and both eIF2β and -2γ mediate guanine nucleotide exchange

Journal

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 14, Pages 5225-5234

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00495-07

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F013272/1, BB/D000106/1] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Wellcome Trust [069696] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D000106/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. BBSRC [BB/D000106/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diverse guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) regulate the activity of GTP binding proteins. One of the most complicated pairs is eukaryotic initiation factor 2B (eIF2B) and eIF2, which function during protein synthesis initiation in eukaryotes. We have mutated conserved surface residues within the eIF2B GEF domain, located at the eIF2B epsilon C terminus. Extensive genetic and biochemical characterization established how these residues contribute to GEF activity. We find that the universally conserved residue E569 is critical for activity and that even a conservative E569D substitution is lethal in vivo. Several mutations within residues close to E569 have no discernible effect on growth or GCN4 expression, but an alanine substitution at the adjacent L568 is cold sensitive and deregulates GCN4 activity at 15 degrees C. The mutation of W699, found on a separate surface approximately 40 angstrom from E569, is also lethal. Binding studies show that W699 is critical for interaction with eIF2 beta, while L568 and E569 are not. In contrast, all three residues are critical for interaction with eIF2 gamma. These data show that multiple contacts between eIF2 gamma and eIF2B epsilon mediate nucleotide exchange.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available