4.4 Article

An international study to standardize the detection and quantitation of BCR-ABL transcripts from stabilized peripheral blood preparations by quantitative RT-PCR

Journal

HAEMATOLOGICA
Volume 92, Issue 7, Pages 970-973

Publisher

FERRATA STORTI FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.11172

Keywords

standardization; quantitative PCR; BCR-ABL; chronic myelogenous leukemia

Categories

Funding

  1. Novartis Pharma, Nurnberg, Germany
  2. Qiagen, Hilden, Germany
  3. Competence Network 'Acute and chronic leukemias' - German Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (Projekttrager Gesundheitsforschung
  4. DLR e.V.) [01 GI9980/6]
  5. European LeukemiaNet within the 6th European Community Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to the lack of comparability of BCR-ABL mRNA quantification results generated by various methodologies in different laboratories, an international multicenter trial was started with the participation of six laboratories (platforms: LightCycler (TM), LC, n=3; TaqMan (TM), TM, n=3). One hundred and eighty-six PB samples derived from healthy donors were spiked with serial dilutions (1:20 to 1:2x10(6)) of b2a2, b3a2 or e1a2 BCR-ABL positive white blood cells (WBC) from leukemic patients. After PAXgene (TM) stabilization, blinding, freezing and distribution, standardized RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, PCR protocols and data evaluation were carried out. There was no significant difference in the results achieved using LC and TM technologies, but a considerable overall variation (CV=0.74 for ratios BCR-ABL/ABL). Up to a dilution of 1:1,000, 27/30 of the 2.5 mL samples tested positive. For higher dilutions, a PB volume of 5 or 10 ml was required to improve sensitivity. The study showed the feasibility of RQ-PCR standardization independent of the PCR machine used.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available