4.6 Article

Chronic insomnia as a risk factor for developing anxiety and depression

Journal

SLEEP
Volume 30, Issue 7, Pages 873-880

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/sleep/30.7.873

Keywords

insomnia; anxiety disorders; depression; cohort study; risk factors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study Objective: To study prospectively the relations of insomnia to the development of anxiety disorders and depression in a population-based sample. Design: Cohort study based on data from 2 general health surveys of the adult population. Setting: Two general health surveys in the adult population in Nord-Trondelag County of Norway, HUNT-1 performed in 1984-6 and HUNT-2 in 1995-7 Participants: Participants without significant anxiety and depression in HUNT-1 were categorized according to the presence and absence of insomnia in the 2 surveys (N=25,130). Measurements and Results: Anxiety disorders and depression in HUNT2 were assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and analyzed using multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, gender, education, comorbid depression/anxiety, and history of insomnia. Anxiety disorders in HUNT-2 were significantly associated with the group with insomnia in HUNT-1 only (OR 1.6; 95% Cl, 1.1-2.3), the group with insomnia in HUNT-2 only (OR 3.4; 95% Cl, 3.1-3.8), as well as with the group with insomnia in both surveys (OR 4.9; 95% Cl, 3.8-6.4). Depression in HUNT-2 was significantly associated with the group with insomnia in HUNT-2 only (OR 1.8; 95% Cl, 1.6-2.0), but not with the groups with insomnia in HUNT-1 only or with insomnia in both surveys. Conclusions: Only a state-like association between insomnia and depression was found. In addition to being a state marker, insomnia may be a trait marker for individuals at risk for developing anxiety disorders. Results are consistent with insomnia being a risk factor for the development of anxiety disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available