4.3 Article

Involvement of inducible nitric oxide synthase in blood flow decrease in vein induced by hen-egg white lysozyme

Journal

BIOLOGICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN
Volume 30, Issue 7, Pages 1324-1328

Publisher

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1248/bpb.30.1324

Keywords

blood flow; inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS); allergy preventive medicine; nitric oxide (NO); hen-egg white lysozyme (HEL)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our in vivo assay system developed to search for allergy-preventive substances, assesses the blood flow decrease in tail vein microcirculation of mice subjected to sensitization with hen-egg white lysozyme (HEL). The blood flow decrease appears to be regulated by various factors such as nitric oxide (NO), thromboxane (TX) A(2), prostacyclin (PGI(2)) and endothelin (ET)-l together with cyclooxygenase (COX)-l, COX-2, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and constitutive nitric oxide synthase (cNOS). In this study, we examined in detail the roles of iNOS in this assay system using an iNOS knockout (KO) mouse. We found that the blood flow decrease in the HEL-sensitized iNOS KO mice was slightly weaker than that in their wild type (WT) mice. This blood flow decrease was not affected by a selective COX-1 inhibitor, a selective COX-2 inhibitor and a PGI(2) agonist unlike the case of the WT mice. However, it was inhibited by a nonselective NOS inhibitor, a specific TXA(2) synthase inhibitor and a specific ET-1 receptor blocker as in the case of the WT mice. The present results indicate that the blood flow decrease occurs via two pathways; one is an iNOS-independent response involving TXA(2) and ET-I, and the other is an iNOS-dependent response involving COX-1, COX-2 and PGI(2)center dot cNOS appears to play some roles in the blood flow decrease and iNOS acts as an exacerbation factor. Our method using HEL-sensitized should be useful for searching for agents that can prevent allergy via new mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available