4.7 Article

Comparison of HIV-derived lentiviral and MLV-based gammaretroviral vector integration sites in primate repopulating cells

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages 1356-1365

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/sj.mt.6300159

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL66947, HL53750] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI63959, AI061839, P30 AI27757] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK071657, DK47754, DK56456] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The potential for leukemia caused by retroviral vector integration has become a significant concern for hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy. We analyzed the distribution of vector integrants in pigtailed macaque and baboon repopulating cells for the two most commonly used retroviral vector systems, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-based lentiviral vectors and murine leukemia virus (MLV)-based gammaretroviral vectors, to help define their relative genotoxicity. All animals had polyclonal engraftment with no apparent adverse effects from transplantation with gene-modified cells. In all, 380 MLV and 235 HIV unique vector integration sites were analyzed and had distinct distribution patterns in relation to genes and CpG islands as observed in previous in vitro studies. Both vector types were found more frequently in and near proto-oncogenes in repopulating cells than in a random dataset. Analysis of functional classes of genes with integrants within 100 kilobases (kb) of their transcription start sites showed an over-representation of genes involved in growth or survival near both lentiviral and gammaretroviral integrants. Microarray analysis showed that both gammaretroviral and lentiviral vectors were found close to genes with high expression levels in primitive cells enriched for hematopoietic stem cells. These data help define the relative risk of insertional mutagenesis with MLV-, HIV-, and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-based vectors in a highly relevant primate model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available