4.8 Article

A Structural Mass Spectrometry Strategy for the Relative Quantitation of Ligands on Mixed Monolayer-Protected Gold Nanoparticles

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 82, Issue 22, Pages 9268-9274

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac102175z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. VU
  2. Vanderbilt Chemistry-Biology Interface (CBI) [T32 GM065086]
  3. Warren Fellowship
  4. NIH [GM076479]
  5. Vanderbilt College of Arts and Sciences
  6. Vanderbilt Institute of Chemical Biology
  7. Vanderbilt Institute of Nanoscale Science and Engineering
  8. Vanderbilt Institute of Integrative Biosystems Research and Education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is becoming increasingly common to use gold nanopartides (AuNPs) protected by a heterogeneous mixture of thiolate ligands, but many ligand mixtures on AuNPs cannot be properly characterized due to the inherent limitations of commonly used spectroscopic techniques. Using ion mobility-mass spectrometry (IM-MS), we have developed a strategy that allows measurement of the relative quantity of ligands on AuNP surfaces. This strategy is used for the characterization of three samples of mixed-ligand AuNPs: tiopronin:glutathione (av diameter 2.5 nm), octanethiol:decanethiol (av diameter 3.6 nm), and tiopronin:11-mercaptoundecyl(poly ethylene glycol) (av diameter 2.5 nm). For validation purposes, the results obtained for tiopronin:glutathione AuNPs were compared to parallel measurements using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (MS) without ion mobility separation. Relative quantitation measurements for NMR and IM-MS were in excellent agreement, with an average difference of less than 1% relative abundance. IM-MS and MS without ion mobility separation were not comparable, due to a lack of ion signals for MS. The other two mixed-ligand AuNPs provide examples of measurements that cannot be performed using NMR spectroscopy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available