4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

The esthetic challenge of adjacent implants

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
Volume 65, Issue 7, Pages 2-12

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.03.015

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reformation of natural-appearing sulcular and papilla anatomy between adjacent implants in the esthetic zone presents a complex challenge for the implant team. Guidelines for implant placement of adjacent implants and soft tissue development are introduced that optimize esthetic results. The rule of 3x3x3 PIE is a mnemonic, based on biologically and prosthetically driven implant placement, which maximizes the potential for optimal esthetics between adjacent implants. The 4 interdependent principles of the 3x3x3 PIE rules are as follows: 1) the platforms of the implants should be located 3 mm apical to the zeniths of the predetermined facial-gingival margins of the planned restorations, 2) the centers of the implants should be placed at a distance at least 3 mm palatal to the anticipated facial margins, 3) interimplant spacing of 3 mm is required between adjacent implant platforms, and 4) the implants should emerge through the palatal incisal edge of the ensuing crown positions. After placement of adjacent implants by the surgeon according to the rule of 3x3x3 PIE, the restorative dentist must then develop the remaining soft tissue beginning with a provisional restoration. The reformed peri-implant gingiva is then supported by the subgingival contours of the definitive abutments and crowns. If ideal gingival esthetics are not achievable, pontics or gingival-colored porcelain can be acceptable alternatives. New technologies, inculding platform switching, are enhancing clinicians' abilities to deliver consistent esthetic result with adjacent implants. (C) American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available