4.4 Review

Carbon acquisition by diatoms

Journal

PHOTOSYNTHESIS RESEARCH
Volume 93, Issue 1-3, Pages 79-88

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11120-007-9172-2

Keywords

active transport; bacillariophyceae; carbon dioxide; CO2-concentrating mechanism; carbonic anhydrase; C-4 photosynthesis; Form ID Rubisco; pyrenoid

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NER/A/S/2001/01130] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diatoms are responsible for up to 40% of primary productivity in the ocean, and complete genome sequences are available for two species. However, there are very significant gaps in our understanding of how diatoms take up and assimilate inorganic C. Diatom plastids originate from secondary endosymbiosis with a red alga and their Form ID Rubisco (ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase) from horizontal gene transfer, which means that embryophyte paradigms can only give general guidance as to their C acquisition mechanisms. Although diatom Rubiscos have relatively high CO2 affinity and CO2/O-2 selectivity, the low diffusion coefficient for CO2 in water has the potential to restrict the rate of photosynthesis. Diatoms growing in their natural aquatic habitats operate inorganic C concentrating mechanisms (CCMs), which provide a steady-state CO2 concentration around Rubisco higher than that in the medium. How these CCMs work is still a matter of debate. However, it is known that both CO2 and HCO3- are taken up, and an obvious but as yet unproven possibility is that active transport of these species across the plasmalemma and/or the four-membrane plastid envelope is the basis of the CCM. In one marine diatom there is evidence of C-4-like biochemistry which could act as, or be part of, a CCM. Alternative mechanisms which have not been eliminated include the production of CO2 from HCO3- at low pH maintained by a H+ pump, in a compartment close to that containing Rubisco.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available