4.8 Article

Automated Support-Resolution Strategy for a One-Way Chemiluminescent Multiplex Immunoassay

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 81, Issue 13, Pages 5484-5489

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac900724m

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Fund for Creative Research Groups [20821063]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20535010, 90713015, 20875044, 20845005]
  3. Department of Health of Jiangsu Province [RC2007069]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BS2006074, BK2008014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An automated support-resolution strategy was designed to couple with a flow-through immunosensing system for performing a one-way chemiluminescent (CL) multiplex immunoassay. Different from multilabel and multichannel-based detection techniques, this immunoassay method employed a single horseradish peroxidase (HRP) label in one way. With the use of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) as model analytes, the capture antibodies for CEA and AFP were immobilized on the inner wall of a glass tube and the surface of paramagnetic microspheres (PMs), respectively. The on-line incubation could be performed in the glass tube after introducing the mixture of CEA, HRP-labeled anti-CEA antibody, AFP, anti-AFP immobilized PMs, and HRP-labeled anti-AFP antibody. With the use of a wash step, the formed sandwich immunocomplexes were separated automatically and the immunocomplex immobilized PMs were captured in another unmodified glass tube with a magnet. The CL signals from the two glass tubes were near-simultaneously collected with the aid of an optical shutter to perform quantitative detection. CEA and AFP could be rapidly assayed in the ranges of 1.0-60 and 1.0-80 ng/mL within 27 min. The assay results of clinical serum samples with the proposed method were in an acceptable agreement with the reference values. This system provides a promising multiplex immunoassay approach for clinical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available