4.6 Article

On the repeatability of brush-evoked allodynia using a novel semi-quantitative method in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain

Journal

PAIN
Volume 130, Issue 1-2, Pages 40-46

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.10.021

Keywords

dynamic mechanical allodynia; brush-evoked pain; neuropathic pain; repeatability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using a semi-quantitative method the repeatability of brush-evoked allodynia was examined within and between days in nine patients with spontaneous ongoing pain and dynamic mechanical allodynia due to peripheral neuropathy. In addition, the relationship between the intensity of spontaneous ongoing pain and the total brush-evoked pain intensity was addressed. The brush stimulus was applied in the innervation territory of the lesioned nervous structure by lightly stroking 60 min of the skin four times with an 8 min wide brush. Using a computerized visual analogue scale the patients continuously rated the intensity and duration of brush-evoked allodynia and the total brush-evoked pain intensity was calculated as the area under the curve. The patients were examined 4 days during one month, i.e. at day 1, 3, 28 and 30 and each study day the stimulus was repeated four times with an inter-stimulus interval of 10 min. The variation between repeated assessments was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the total brush-evoked pain intensity within days ranged from 0.89 to 0.95 (very good repeatability) and between days from 0.77 to 0.97 (very good repeatability). A significant positive correlation was demonstrated between the mean intensity of spontaneous ongoing pain and the mean total brush-evoked pain intensity (r(s) = 0.68, P < 0.042, a moderate to good correlation). (C) 2006 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available