4.8 Article

Directional Surface Plasmon Coupled Luminescence for Analytical Sensing Applications: Which Metal, What Wavelength, What Observation Angle?

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 81, Issue 16, Pages 6913-6922

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac900973r

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Middle Atlantic Regional Center of Excellence for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases [NIH NLAID-U54 A1057168]
  2. NIH National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R21 NS055187-01]
  3. NIH K25 Career Development Award [1-K25EB007565-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ability of luminescent species in the near-field to both induce and couple to surface plasmons has been known for many years, with highly directional emission from films (Surface Plasmon Coupled Luminescence, SPCL) facilitating the development of sensitive near-field assay sensing platforms, to name but just one application. Because of the near-field nature of the effect, only luminescent species (fluorescence, chemiluminescence and phosphoregcence) within a few hundred nanometers from the surface play a role in coupling, which in terms of biosensing, provides for limited penetration into opticafly dense media, such as in whole blood. Another attractive feature is the highly polarized and angular dependent emission which allows both fixed angle and wavelength dependent emission angles to be realized at high polarization ratios. In this paper, a generic procedure based on theoretical Fresnel calculations, which outlines the step-by-step selection of an appropriate metal for SPCL applications is presented. It is also shown that 11 different metals have differing properties in different spectral regions and offer either fixed angle or wavelength-dependent angular shifts in emission. In addition, it is shown that both chemiluminescence and phosphorescence can also be observed in a highly directional manner similar to coupled fluorescence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available