4.7 Article

L-glutamine in vitro regulates rat aortic glutamate content and modulates nitric oxide formation and contractility responses

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-CELL PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 293, Issue 1, Pages C142-C151

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00589.2006

Keywords

L-leucine; alpha-ketoisocaproate; thoracic aorta; cGMP; endothelium; smooth muscle

Ask authors/readers for more resources

These studies test the hypothesis that L-glutamine at its physiological plasma concentration, similar to 0.5 mM, can increase tissue content and net synthesis of glutamate in rat aortic segments in vitro, thereby mediating relaxation of the underlying smooth muscle in the elastic reservoir region of the thoracic aorta. Aortic segments were incubated in an isotonic medium with and without 21 amino acids at their normal plasma concentrations. Of these amino acids only L-glutamine and L-leucine at their plasma concentrations increased glutamate synthesis and content. Tissue glutamate content resulting from increasing concentrations of each precursor reached an upper level of similar to 1.3 - 1.6 mu mol/g wet wt. Regulation of the tissue glutamate content involves an interaction of the synthetic pathways in which L-glutamine inhibits the endothelial leucine-to-glutamate pathway. L-Glutamine increases nitric oxide (NO) formation, and NO inhibits the controlling enzyme of the endothelial leucine-to-glutamate pathway, the branched-chain alpha-ketoacid dehydrogenase complex. Treatment of precontracted aortic rings with 0.5 mM L-glutamine elicits smooth muscle relaxation, a response that requires endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity and an intact endothelium. The results demonstrate that in vitro L-glutamine at its normal concentration in plasma can regulate rat aortic glutamate content and modulate NO formation and contractility responses of the thoracic aortic wall.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available