4.8 Article

Quantitative Proteomics: Measuring Protein Synthesis Using 15N Amino Acid Labeling in Pancreatic Cancer Cells

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 81, Issue 2, Pages 764-771

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac801905g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Bone Biology Program of the Cancer and Smoking Related Disease Research Program
  2. Nebraska Tobacco Settlement Biomedical Research Program [289104-845610]
  3. UCLA Center of Excellence in Pancreatic Disease [P01 AT003960-01]
  4. Harbor-UCLA GCRC Mass Spectrometry Core [M01 RR00425-33]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pancreatic cancer MIA PaCa cells were cultured in the presence and absence of N-15 amino acids mixture for 72 h. During protein synthesis, the incorporation of N-15 amino acids results in a new mass isotopomer distribution in protein, which is approximated by the concatenation of two binomial distributions of C-13 and 15N. The fraction of protein synthesis (FSR) can thus be determined from the relative intensities of the labeled (new) and the unlabeled (old) spectra. Six prominent spots were picked from 2-D gels of proteins from lysates of cells cultured in 0% (control), 50%, and 33% N-15 enriched media. These protein spots were digested and analyzed with matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight/time-of-flight (MAILDI-TOF/TOF) mass spectrometry. The isotopomer distribution of peptides after labeling can be fully accounted for by the labeled (new) and unlabeled (old) peptides. The ratio of the new and old peptide fractions was determined using multiple regression analysis of the observed spectrum as a linear combination of the expected new and the old spectra. The fractional protein synthesis rates calculated from such ratios of the same peptide from cells grown in 50% and 33% 15N amino acid enrichments were comparable to each other. The FSR of these six identified proteins ranged between 44 and 76%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available