4.2 Article

Preliminary study of the safety and efficacy of donepezil hydrochloride in children with down syndrome: A clinical report series

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
Volume 143A, Issue 13, Pages 1408-1413

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31790

Keywords

donepezil hydrochloride; Down syndrome; cholinesterase inhibitors; safety; efficacy; cognitive function; memory; attention

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR 00030, 5K23 RR 16060-03] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is growing evidence to Support the use of early central cholinergic enhancement to improve cognitive functioning in individuals with Down syndrome (DS). This report summarizes preliminary safety and cognitive efficacy data for seven children (8-13 years) with DS who participated in a 22-week, open-label trial of donepezil hydrochloride. Donepezil was closed once daily at 2.5 mg and, based on tolerability, increased to 5 mg/day. Safety assessments were conducted at Week 1 (baseline), Week 8 (2-5 mg donepezil), Week 16 (5 mg) and Week 22 (after the donepezil had been discontinued). Measures of cognitive function were administered at each visit, encompassing the following domains: memory; attention; mood; and adaptive functioning. Donepezil was well tolerated at the 2.5 and 5 mg doses. The side effects were mild, transient, and consistent with the adverse events noted with cholinesterase inhibitors. Some children showed improvement on measures of memory (NEPSY Memory for Names and Narrative Memory) and sustained attention to tasks (Conners' Parent Rating Scales), although increased irritability and/or assertiveness were noted in some patients. Overall, this clinical report series adds to our initial findings of language gains in children with DS treated with donepezil. It also supports the need for larger, double-blind studies of the safety and efficacy of donepezil and other cholinesterase inhibitors for children with DS. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available