4.7 Article

Splenic immune responses during canine visceral leishmaniasis

Journal

VETERINARY RESEARCH
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages 547-564

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1051/vetres:2007015

Keywords

canine visceral leishmaniasis; IFN-gamma; IL-4; T-bet; IP-10

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dogs are the main reservoir host for zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis caused by Leishma- Leishmania infantum nia infantum. In this study we investigated the immune response in spleens of. L. infantum- infected dogs by measuring the mRNA expression levels for a wide panel of cytokines, transcription factors and chemokines. mRNA levels and parasite load were followed during 7 months of experimental infection and 14 months post- treatment, and were compared to naturally-infected (NI) dogs. tal Similarly, serum anti- Leishmania IgG and IgG subclass levels were measured during experimental infection. An increase in IFN-gamma, T-bet, IP-10 and RANTES was found in the experimentally and, NI dogs, implicating a substantial type-1 immune response during canine visceral leishmaniasis. IL-4, a type-2 associated cytokine, increased as early as one month after experimental infection, while IL-5 was high at later stages. Interestingly, the expression levels of the Treg-associated cytokines, IL-10 and TGF-beta, did not change during the infection. Total anti-Leishmania IgG and IgG subclasses increased during the experimental infection. However, no association with specific cytokine patterns was observed. Parasite load in the spleens increased as early as one month post- postinfection and remained high until treatment. The load was higher in the polysymptomatic NI dogs infection than in the experimentally- infected dogs. This study indicates that both type-1 and type-2 immune responses occur in the spleen during canine L. infantum infection, and suggests that the early elevation of IL-4 might have a role in the persistence of parasites in the presence of high IFN-elevation expression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available