4.8 Article

Gold nanoelectrode ensembles for the simultaneous electrochemical detection of ultratrace arsenic, mercury, and copper

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 80, Issue 13, Pages 4836-4844

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac071064w

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Simultaneous electrochemical detection of As(III), Hg(II), and Cu(II) using a highly sensitive platform based on gold nanoelectrode ensembles (GNEEs) is described. GNEEs were grown by colloidal chemical approach on thiol-functionalized sol-gel derived three-dimensional silicate network preassembled on a polycrystalline gold (Au) electrode. GNEEs on the silicate network have been characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, and electrochemical measurements. Square wave anodic stripping voltammetry (SWASV) has been used for the detection of As(111) and Hg(H) without any interference from Cu(11) at the potentials of 0.06 and 0.53 V, respectively. The GNEE electrode is highly sensitive, and it shows linear response for As(III) and Hg(II) up to 15 ppb. The detection limit (signal-to-noise ratio = 4) of the GNEE electrode toward As(111) and Hg(H) is 0.02 ppb, which is well below the guideline value given by the World Health Organization (WHO). The potential application of the GNEE electrode for the detection of As(III) in. a real sample collected from the arsenic-contaminated water in 24 North Parganas, West Bengal is demonstrated. The GNEE electrode has been successfully used for the simultaneous detection of As(111), Cu(H), and Hg(H) at sub-part-per-billion level without any interference for the first time. The nanostructured electrode shows individual voltammetzic peaks for As(111), Cu(II), and Hg(H) at 0.06, 0.35, and 0.53 V, respectively. The analytical performance of the GNEE electrode is superior to the existing electrodes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available