4.6 Article

An X-ray survey in SA 57 with XMM-Newton

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 469, Issue 3, Pages 1211-1219

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077359

Keywords

surveys; galaxies : active; galaxies : quasars : general; X-rays : galaxies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context. The maximum number density of Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs), as deduced from X-ray studies, occurs at z less than or similar to 1, with lower luminosity objects peaking at smaller redshifts. Optical studies lead to a different evolutionary behaviour, with a number density peaking at z approximate to 2 independently of the intrinsic luminosity, but this result is limited to active nuclei brighter than the host galaxy. A selection based on optical variability can detect low luminosity AGNs (LLAGNs), where the host galaxy light prevents the identification by non-stellar colours. Aims. We want to collect X-ray data in a field where it exists an optically-selected sample of variable galaxies, i.e. variable objects with diffuse appearance, to investigate the X-ray and optical properties of the population of AGNs, particularly of low luminosity ones, where the host galaxy is visible. Methods. We observed a field of 0.2 deg(2) in the Selected Area 57, for 67 ks with XMM-Newton. We detected X-ray sources, and we correlated the list with a photographic survey of SA 57, complete to B-J similar to 23 and with available spectroscopic data. Results. We obtained a catalogue of 140 X-ray sources to limiting fluxes 5 x 10(-16), 2 x 10(-15) erg cm(-2) s(-1) in the 0.5 - 2 keV and 2 - 10 keV respectively, 98 of which are identified in the optical bands. The X-ray detection of part of the variability-selected candidates confirms their AGN nature. Diffuse variable objects populate the low luminosity side of the sample. Only 25/44 optically-selected QSOs are detected in X-rays. 15% of all QSOs in the field have X/O < 0.1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available