4.2 Article

Molecular phylogenetic evidence for paraphyly of the genus Sooglossus, with the description of a new genus of Seychellean frogs

Journal

BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
Volume 91, Issue 3, Pages 347-359

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00800.x

Keywords

Amphibia; Anura; biogeography; Leptosooglossus; molecular phylogeny; Nesomantis; new genus; Sooglossidae; Sooglossus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Seychelles harbour an endemic frog family, the Sooglossidae, currently containing two genera: Sooglossus, with three species, and Nesomantis, with one species. These unique frogs are generally considered to be basal neobatrachians, although their relationships to other neobatrachian taxa, except the Nasikabatrachidae, remain unresolved. Our molecular phylogeny based on a dataset consisting of fragments of the nuclear rag-1 and rag-2 genes, as well as mitochondrial 16S rRNA in representatives of the major neobatrachian lineages, confirmed the previously postulated Sooglossidae + Nasikabatrachidae clade and the placement of the South American Caudiverbera with the Australian Myobatrachidae, but did not further resolve the position of sooglossids. Our results do, however, unambiguously show sooglossids to be monophyletic but the genus Sooglossus to be paraphyletic, with the type species Sooglossus sechellensis being more closely related to Nesomantis thomasseti than to Sooglossus gardineri and Sooglossus pipilodryas, in agreement with morphological, karyological, and bioacoustic data. As a taxonomic consequence, we propose to consider the genus name Nesomantis as junior synonym of Sooglossus, and to transfer the species thomasseti to Sooglossus. For the clade composed of the species gardineri and pipilodryas, here, we propose the new generic name Leptosooglossus. A significant genetic differentiation of 3% was found between specimens of Sooglossus thomasseti from the Mahe and Silhouette Islands, highlighting the need for further studies on their possible taxonomic distinctness. (c) 2007 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2007, 91, 347-359.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available