4.8 Article

Identification of 22 candidate structured RNAs in bacteria using the CMfinder comparative genomics pipeline

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 35, Issue 14, Pages 4809-4819

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm487

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR19895-02, S10 RR019895] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHGRI NIH HHS [R01 HG002602, R01 HG02602] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM068819, GM 068819] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We applied a computational pipeline based on comparative genomics to bacteria, and identified 22 novel candidate RNA motifs. We predicted six to be riboswitches, which are mRNA elements that regulate gene expression on binding a specific metabolite. In separate studies, we confirmed that two of these are novel riboswitches. Three other riboswitch candidates are upstream of either a putative transporter gene in the order Lactobacillales, citric acid cycle genes in Burkholderiales or molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis genes in several phyla. The remaining riboswitch candidate, the widespread Genes for the Environment, for Membranes and for Motility (GEMM) motif, is associated with genes important for natural competence in Vibrio cholerae and the use of metal ions as electron acceptors in Geobacter sulfurreducens. Among the other motifs, one has a genetic distribution similar to a previously published candidate riboswitch, ykkC/yxkD, but has a different structure. We identified possible non-coding RNAs in five phyla, and several additional cis-regulatory RNAs, including one in e-proteobacteria (upstream of purD, involved in purine biosynthesis), and one in Cyanobacteria (within an ATP synthase operon). These candidate RNAs add to the growing list of RNA motifs involved in multiple cellular processes, and suggest that many additional RNAs remain to be discovered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available