4.5 Article

Methyl-CpG binding domain proteins and their involvement in the regulation of the MAGE-A1, MAGE-A2, MAGE-A3, and IMAGE-A12 gene promoters

Journal

MOLECULAR CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 5, Issue 7, Pages 749-759

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-06-0364

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Promoter hypermethylation is responsible for the restricted expression of the tumor-associated MAGE antigens. In order to elucidate the mechanism underlying methylation-dependent repression, we examined the involvement of methyl-CpG binding proteins, MBD1, MBD2a, and MeCP2, in silencing of MAGE-A1, MAGE-A2, MAGE-A3, and MAGE-A12 genes. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays displayed binding of MBD1 to the methylated and unmethylated MAGE-A promoters. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, in vivo binding of MBD1 and MeCP2 to the promoters could be observed in MCF-7 and T47D cells. Transient transfection assays of MCF-7 cells were done with the transcriptional repression domains (TRD) of MBD1, MBD2a, and MeCP2, and MAGE-A1, MAGE-A2, MAGE-A3, and MAGE-A12 promoters. Whereas the TRI) of MBD1 and MeCP2 repressed the MAGE-A promoters, the TRI) of MBD2 had no inhibiting effect on the promoter activity. Furthermore, cotransfections of Mbd1-deficient mouse fibroblasts and MCF-7 cells with MBD2a, MeCP2, and the MBD1 splice variants, 1v1 and 10, showed that strong methylation-dependent repression of the MAGE-A promoters could not be further down-regulated by these proteins. However, the two MBD1 splice variants, 1v1 and 1v3, were able to repress the basal activity of unmethylated MAGE-A promoters. Additional cotransfection experiments with both isoforms of MBD1 and the transcription factor Ets-1 showed that Ets-1 could not abrogate the MBD1-mediated suppression. In contrast with the repressive effect mediated by MBD1, MBD2a was found to up-regulate the basal activity of the promoters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available