4.5 Article

Cell cycle dependent antagonistic interactions between paclitaxel and carboplatin in combination therapy

Journal

CANCER BIOLOGY & THERAPY
Volume 6, Issue 7, Pages 1067-1073

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/cbt.6.7.4323

Keywords

apoptosis; cell cycle arrest; paclitaxel; combination; therapy; drug interaction

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA92280] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel is widely used to treat multiple solid tumors including ovarian, lung and breast cancer. Usually these drugs are given simultaneously with little regard to the importance of scheduling to obtain a maximal response. To investigate the importance of sequencing, the human breast Bcap37 and ovarian OV2008 cancer cell lines were exposed to carboplatin and paclitaxel in three different sequences: (1) pretreatment with paclitaxel followed by carboplatin, (2) pretreatment of carboplatin followed by paclitaxel and (3) simultaneous treatment with these two agents. The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel resulted in antagonistic interactions when tumor cells were exposed to carboplatin prior to paclitaxel or exposed to the two drugs simultaneously, but there was little antagonistic interaction observed when paclitaxel was administered before carboplatin. Biochemical examination revealed that pretreatment or cotreatment of carboplatin inhibited paclitaxel-induced I kappa B alpha degradation and bcl-2 phosphorylation. Further analyses demonstrated that carboplatin could significantly interfere with the cytotoxic effects of paclitaxel on both mitotic arrest and apoptotic cell death unless paclitaxel was administered before carboplatin. These results indicate that the interaction between paclitaxel and carboplatin is highly schedule dependent. The optimal schedule for this combination is sequential exposure of paclitaxel followed by carboplatin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available