4.5 Article

Cooperation between p27 and p107 during endochondral ossification suggests a genetic pathway controlled by p27 and p130

Journal

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 14, Pages 5161-5171

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.02431-06

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA89563, R01 CA089563, P30 CA008748] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [R01 AR049069] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIA NIH HHS [R01 AG020719] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM052597] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pocket proteins and cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors negatively regulate cell proliferation and can promote differentiation. However, which members of these gene families, which cell type they interact in, and what they do to promote differentiation in that cell type during mouse development are largely unknown. To identify the cell types in which p107 and p27 interact, we generated compound mutant mice. These mice were null for p107 and had a deletion in p27 that prevented its binding to cyclin-CDK complexes. Although a fraction of these animals survived into adulthood and looked similar to single p27 mutant mice, a larger number of animals died at birth or within a few weeks thereafter. These animals displayed defects in chondrocyte maturation and endochondral bone formation. Proliferation of chondrocytes was increased, and ectopic ossification was observed. Uncommitted mouse embryo fibroblasts could be induced into the chondrocytic lineage ex vivo, but these cells failed to mature normally. These results demonstrate that p27 carries out overlapping functions with p107 in controlling cell cycle exit during chondrocyte maturation. The phenotypic similarities between p107(-/-) p27(D51/D51) and p107(-/-) p130(-/-) mice and the cells derived from them suggest that p27 and p130 act in an analogous pathway during chondrocyte maturation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available