4.5 Article

Rapid estimation of the energy charge from cell lysates using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry: Role of in-source fragmentation

Journal

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 447, Issue -, Pages 107-113

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2013.11.013

Keywords

MALDI MS; In-source decay; Energy charge; ATP; Metabolite analysis; Nucleoside phosphates

Funding

  1. European Union for the Marie Curie Initial Training Network ISOLATE [289995]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nucleotides are key players in the central energy metabolism of cells. Here we show how to estimate the energy charge from cell lysates by direct negative ion matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) using 9-aminoacridine as matrix. We found a high level of in-source decay of all the phosphorylated nucleotides, with some of them producing considerable amounts of adenosine-5'-diphosphate (ADP) fragment ions. We investigated the behavior of adenosine-5'-monophosphate (AMP), ADP, and adenosine-5'-triphosphate (ATP) as well as the cofactors coenzyme A (CoA) and acetylcoenzyme A (ACoA) and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotides (NAD(+) and NADH) in detail. In-source decay of these compounds depends strongly on the applied laser power and on the extraction pulse delay. At standard instrument settings, the 9-aminoacridine (9-AA) matrix resulted in a much higher in-source decay compared with 2,4,6-trihydroxyacetophenone (2,4,6-TRAP). By adding C-13-labeled ATP to a cell lysate, we were able to determine the degree of in-source decay during an experiment. Analyzing a cell extract of the monocytic cell line THP-1 with [C-13]ATP as internal standard, we were able to obtain values for the energy charge that were similar to those determined by a reference liquid chromatography electrospray ionization coupled to mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS) method. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available