4.7 Article

Persistent scatterer interferometric synthetic aperture radar for crustal deformation analysis, with application to Volcan Alcedo, Galapagos

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
Volume 112, Issue B7, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2006JB004763

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While conventional interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) is a very effective technique for measuring crustal deformation, almost any interferogram includes large areas where the signals decorrelate and no measurement is possible. Persistent scatterer (PS) InSAR overcomes the decorrelation problem by identifying resolution elements whose echo is dominated by a single scatterer in a series of interferograms. Existing PS methods have been very successful in analysis of urban areas, where stable angular structures produce efficient reflectors that dominate background scattering. However, man-made structures are absent from most of the Earth's surface. Furthermore, existing methods identify PS pixels based on the similarity of their phase history to an assumed model for how deformation varies with time, whereas characterizing the temporal pattern of deformation is commonly one of the aims of any deformation study. We describe here a method for PS analysis, StaMPS, that uses spatial correlation of interferogram phase to find pixels with low-phase variance in all terrains, with or without buildings. Prior knowledge of temporal variations in the deformation rate is not required for their identification. We apply StaMPS to Volcan Alcedo, where conventional InSAR fails because of dense vegetation on the upper volcano flanks that causes most pixels to decorrelate with time. We detect two sources of deformation. The first we model as a contracting pipe-like body, which we interpret to be a crystallizing magma chamber. The second is downward and lateral motion on the inner slopes of the caldera, which we interpret as landsliding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available