4.6 Article

In vitro examination of DHA-edible micro-algae 2.: Effect on rumen methane production and apparent degradability of hay

Journal

ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 136, Issue 1-2, Pages 80-95

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.08.016

Keywords

rumen; methane; fermentation pattern; micro-algae; lipolysis; DHA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In 24 h in vitro incubations with 25 ml of buffered rumen fluid, four doses (0, 20.8,41.6 and 83.3 mg) of a DHA-edible algae product, Aquagrow-DHA, were examined in combination with sunflower (20 mg) or linseed oil (20 mg). One treatment contained no Aquagrow-DHA, linseed or sunflower oil and one was supplemented with Aquagrow-DHA (166.6 mg) only. Addition of lard ensured that total fat content was constant among incubations. Increasing amounts of Aquagrow-DHA progressively inhibited CH4 to a maximum of 80% (P < 0.001). Increased CH4 inhibition was accompanied by decreased acetate (P < 0.001) and butyrate (P < 0.001), and increased propionate (P < 0.001) proportions, but also by depression of the short chain fatty acid (SCFA) production by 30% at the highest Aquagrow-DHA level (P < 0.001). However, SCFA inhibition only occurred when the Aquagrow-DHA dose exceeded 41.6 mg and CH4 production was reduced by about 30% (P < 0.05) at this dose. Inhibitory effects were linked to the amount of unesterified polyunsaturated fatty acids, particularly docosahexaenoic acid. Incubations under partial H-2 atmosphere suggested that a direct toxic effect to rumen methanogens was caused by higher amounts of unesterified DHA (> 41.6 mg Aquagrow-DHA/incubation) only, whereas suppression of rumen methanogenesis at lower doses seemed to be indirect through a lack of substrate. This indicates bacteria providing H-2 to the rumen methanogens to be more sensitive to unesterified DHA than rumen methanogens. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available