4.7 Article

Regulation of tendon differentiation by scleraxis distinguishes force-transmitting tendons from muscle-anchoring tendons

Journal

DEVELOPMENT
Volume 134, Issue 14, Pages 2697-2708

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/DEV.001933

Keywords

scleraxis; tendon; connective tissue; mouse mutant

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [P01 DK56246] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The scleraxis (Scx) gene, encoding a bHLH transcription factor, is expressed in the progenitors and cells of all tendon tissues. To determine Scx function, we produced a mutant null allele. Scx(-/-) mice were viable, but showed severe tendon defects, which manifested in a drastically limited use of all paws and back muscles and a complete inability to move the tail. Interestingly, although the differentiation of all force-transmitting and intermuscular tendons was disrupted, other categories of tendons, the function of which is mainly to anchor muscles to the skeleton, were less affected and remained functional, enabling the viability of Scx(-/-) mutants. The force- transmitting tendons of the limbs and tail varied in the severity to which they were affected, ranging from dramatic failure of progenitor differentiation resulting in the loss of segments or complete tendons, to the formation of small and poorly organized tendons. Tendon progenitors appeared normal in Scx(-/-) embryos and a phenotype resulting from a failure in the condensation of tendon progenitors to give rise to distinct tendons was first detected at embryonic day (E) 13.5. In the tendons that persisted in Scx(-/-) mutants, we found a reduced and less organized tendon matrix and disorganization at the cellular level that led to intermixing of tenocytes and endotenon cells. The phenotype of Scx(-/-) mutants emphasizes the diversity of tendon tissues and represents the first molecular insight into the important process of tendon differentiation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available