4.5 Article

Near-infrared-labeled tetracycline derivative is an effective marker of bone deposition in mice

Journal

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 416, Issue 2, Pages 167-173

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2011.05.011

Keywords

IRDye 800CW; Tetracycline derivative; Near-infrared; Molecular imaging; Whole animal imaging; Fluorescence microscopy; Immunofluorescent assay; Mineralization

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 CA106584]
  2. NCRR [P20 RR018759]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bone-specific compounds have been used effectively for the detection of bone mineralization, growth, and morphological changes. These agents typically contain iminodiacetic acid groups that can form complexes with apatite and fluoresce in the visible spectrum. We exploited a subset of these chemical chelators to produce a near-infrared (NIR) optical bone marker for preclinical animal imaging. By conjugating target compounds to IRDye 800CW, we extended the effective fluorescence signal detection to the NIR region without affecting the compound's ability to function as a marker of the mineralization process. Calcein and a tetracycline derivative (BoneTag agent [BT]) bound specifically to differentiated mineralized osteoblast cultures, with the latter exhibiting 6-fold higher signal intensities. Subsequent in vivo testing demonstrated effective skeletal labeling with IRDye 800CW BT. We were able to identify a changing mineralization front in bone sections from (i) normal growing mice injected with IRDye 800CW BT 6 weeks prior to the administration of IRDye 680 Bland (ii) an osteoporosis mouse model comparing cortical bone in sham-treated and ovariectomized mice. These results provide evidence that the NIR-labeled BT is effective as a general marker of skeletal features and an indicator of the bone mineralization and remodeling processes. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available