4.6 Article

Mutants in the Dictyostelium Arp2/3 complex and chemoattractant-induced actin polymerization

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
Volume 313, Issue 12, Pages 2563-2574

Publisher

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.04.029

Keywords

cell motility; Dictyostelium; chemoattractant; adhesion; Arp2/3 complex; chemotaxis; actin polymerization

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_U105115237] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_U105115237] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. MRC [MC_U105115237] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have investigated the role of the Arp2/3 complex in Dictyostelium cell chernotaxis towards cyclic-AMP and in the actin polymerization that is triggered by this chemoattractant. We confirin that the Arp2/3 complex is recruited to the cell perimeter, or into a pseudopod, after cyclic-AMP stimulation and that this is coincident with actin polymerization. This recruitment is inhibited when actin polymerization is blocked using latrunculin suggesting that the complex binds to pre-ex:isting actin filaments, rather than to a membrane associated signaling complex. We show genetically that an intact Arp2/3 complex is essential in Dictyostelium and have produced partially active mutants in two of its subunits. In these mutants both phases of actin polymerization in response to cyclic-AMP are greatly reduced. One mutant projects pseudopodia more slowly than wild type and has impaired chemotaxis, together with slower movement. The second mutant chemotaxes poorly due to an adhesion defect, suggesting that the Arp2/3 complex plays a crucial part in adhering cells to the substratum as they move. We conclude that the Arp2/3 complex largely mediates the actin polymerization response to chemotactic stimulation and contributes to cell motility, pseudopod extension and adhesion in Dictyostelium chernotaxis. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available