4.5 Article

Detection of respiratory syncytial virus using nanoparticle amplified immuno-polymerase chain reaction

Journal

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 410, Issue 1, Pages 141-148

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2010.11.033

Keywords

Immuno-PCR; PCR; Viral detection; Respiratory syncytial virus; Gold nanoparticle; Magnetic extraction

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [EB009235]
  2. Vanderbilt University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In traditional immuno-polymerase chain reaction (immuno-PCR), a single antibody recognition event is associated with one to three DNA tags, which are subsequently amplified by PCR. Here we describe a nanoparticle-amplified immuno-PCR (NPA-IPCR) assay that combines antibody recognition of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with a 50-fold nanoparticle valence amplification step prior to tag amplification by PCR. The assay detects a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) surface protein using an antibody bound to a 15-nm gold nanoparticle cofunctionalized with thiolated DNA complementary to a hybridized 76-base tag DNA with a tag DNA/antibody ratio of 50:1. The presence of virus particles triggers the formation of a sandwich complex composed of the gold nanoparticle construct, virus, and an antibody-functionalized magnetic particle used for extraction. After extraction, DNA tags are released by heating to 95 C and detected via real-time PCR. The limit of detection of the assay was compared with ELISA and reversion transcription (RI) PCR using RSV-infected HEp-2 cell extracts. NPA-IPCR showed an approximately 4000-fold improvement in the limit of detection compared with ELISA and a 4-fold improvement compared with viral RNA extraction followed by traditional RT-PCR. NPA-IPCR offers a viable platform for the development of early-stage diagnostics requiring an exceptionally low limit of detection. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available