4.2 Review

Compound heterozygosity for dominant and recessive GJB2 mutations:: Effect on phenotype and review of the literature

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
Volume 143A, Issue 14, Pages 1567-1573

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31701

Keywords

GJB2; connexin 26; compound heterozygosity; genes, recessive; genes, dominant

Funding

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [0R01DC006707] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mutations in GJB2 (which encodes the gap-junction protein connexin 26) are the most common cause of genetic deafness in many populations. To date, more than 100 deafness-causing mutations have been described in this gene. The majority of these imitations are inherited in an autosomal recessive manner, but approximately 19 GJB2 mutations have been associated with dominantly inherited hearing loss. One, W44C, was first identified in two families from France. We subsequently described a family in the United States with the same mutation. In these families, W44C segregates with a dominantly inherited, early-onset, progressive. sensorineural deafness that is worse in the high frequencies. Since that report, we have tested additional family members and identified two siblings who are compound heterozygous for the W44C and K15T mutations. Their father, the original proband, is heterozygous for the dominant W44C mutation, and their mother is compound heterozygous for two recessively inherited mutations, K15T and 35delG. Both children have a profound, sensorineural deafness and use manual communication, in contrast to their parents and other relatives whose hearing losses are less severe and who can communicate orally. The difference in phenotype may be a result of the disruption of different functions of the gap-junction protein by the two mutations, which have an additive effect. (C) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available