4.4 Article

Biochemical analysis of a common human polymorphism associated with age-related macular degeneration

Journal

BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 46, Issue 28, Pages 8451-8461

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi700459a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01-RR00064] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NEI NIH HHS [P30EY014800, R01EY14428, R01EY14448] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIAID NIH HHS [AI11822] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of irreversible blindness in developed countries. A large number of human genetic studies have associated a common variant (Y402H) of complement factor H (CFH) with a highly significant increase in AMD risk. CFH is a modular protein with 20 homologous short consensus repeats (SCRs). The Y402H variant is located in SCR7 of both CFH and factor H-like protein 1 (FHL-1), a splice variant of CFH (containing SCR1-7) with unique biochemical properties. Because SCR7 is known to bind to heparin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and M protein from Streptococcus pyogenes, it has been hypothesized that the AMD-associated polymorphism may affect interactions with these CFH ligands. In this study, we tested this hypothesis in the context of full-length CFH (SCR1-20) and FHL-1. We systematically analyzed the interactions of the Y402 and H402 variants of CFH and FHL-1 with heparin, CRP, and several bacterial ligands: M6 protein of Streptococcus pyogenes, PspC of Streptococcus pneumoniea, and BbCRASP-1 of Borrelia burgdorferi. In comparing the Y and H variants of CFH and FHL-1, we found no significant difference in their protein secretion, cofactor activity, or interactions with heparin, BbCRASP-1, or PspC, but a significant difference in binding to CRP and M6 protein. This study reveals the fundamental properties of a common polymorphism of CFH and lays the groundwork for elucidating the role of CFH in AMD pathogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available