4.7 Article

First measurement of a rapid increase in the AGN fraction in high-redshift clusters of galaxies

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 664, Issue 1, Pages L9-L12

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/520577

Keywords

galaxies : active; galaxies : clusters : individual (Cl 0016+1609, Cl 0542-4100, Cl 0848.6+4453, MS 2053-04); galaxies : evolution

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the first measurement of the AGN fraction in high-redshift clusters of galaxies (z similar to 0.6) with spectroscopy of one cluster and archival data for three additional clusters. We identify eight active galactic nuclei (AGNs) in these clusters from Chandra data that are sensitive to AGNs with hard X- ray (2 - 10 keV) luminosity L-X,L- H > 10(43)ergs s(-1) in host galaxies more luminous than a rest- frame M-R.< -20 mag This stands in sharp contrast to the one AGN with L-X,L-H > 10(43) ergs s(-1) that we discovered in our earlier study of eight low- redshift clusters with z = 0.06-0.31 (z(-) similar to 0.2). Three of the four high-redshift cluster data sets are sensitive to L-X,L-H > 10(42) ergs s(-1), and we identify seven AGNs above this luminosity limit, compared to two AGNs in eight low- redshift clusters. Based on membership estimates for each cluster, we determine that the AGN fractions at are z similar to 0.6 are f(A) (L-X > 10(42.), M-R < - 20) = 0.028 (+0.019)(-0.012) and f(A)(L-X > 10(43.), M-R < -20) = 0.020 (+0.012) (-0.008). These values are approximately a factor of 20 greater than the AGN fractions in lower redshift (z(-) similar to 0.2) cluster of galaxies. The cluster increase also represents substantially faster evolution than observed in the field over this redshift range a factor of 1.3 and 3.3 for L-X > 10(42) and L-X > 10(43), respectively). The cluster AGN fraction increases more rapidly with redshift than the field, and the increase in cluster AGNs indicates the presence of an AGN Butcher-Oemler effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available