4.7 Article

The X-ray concentrationy-virial mass relation

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 664, Issue 1, Pages 123-134

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/518684

Keywords

cosmological parameters; cosmology : observations; dark matter; X-rays : galaxies; X-rays : galaxies : clusters

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the concentration (c)-virial mass (M) relation of 39 galaxy systems ranging in mass from individual early-type galaxies up to the most massive galaxy clusters, (0.06-20) x 10(14) M(circle dot). We selected for analysis the most relaxed systems possessing the highest quality data currently available in the Chandra and XMM-Newton public data archives. A power-law model fitted to the X-ray c-M relation requires at high significance (6.6 sigma) that c decreases with increasing M, which is a general feature of CDM models. The median and scatter of the c-M relation produced by the flat, concordance Lambda CDM model (Omega(m) = 0.3, sigma(8) = 0.9) agrees with the X-ray data, provided that the sample is comprised of the most relaxed, early-forming systems, which is consistent with our selection criteria. When allowing only sigma(8) to vary in the concordance model, the c-M relation requires 0.76 < sigma(8) < 1.07 (99% confidence), assuming a 10% upward bias in the concentrations for early-forming systems. The tilted, low-sigma(8) model suggested by a new WMAP analysis is rejected at 99.99% confidence, but a model with the same tilt and normalization can be reconciled with the X-ray data by increasing the dark energy equation of state parameter to w approximate to -0.8. When imposing the additional constraint of the tight relation between sigma(8) and Omega m from studies of cluster abundances, the X-ray c-M relation excludes (> 99% confidence) both open CDM models and flat CDM models with Omega(m) approximate to 1. This result provides novel evidence for a flat, low-Omega(m) universewith dark energy using observations only in the local (z << 1) universe. Possible systematic errors in the X-ray mass measurements of a magnitude approximate to 10% suggested by CDM simulations do not change our conclusions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available