4.5 Article

Fluorescent-labeled antibodies: Balancing functionality and degree of labeling

Journal

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 402, Issue 2, Pages 146-150

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2010.03.036

Keywords

Antibody; Avidity; Fluorophore/protein ratio; Kinetic ELISA; Global fitting; Optimal labeling

Funding

  1. NIH, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A critical assumption in using labeled antibodies is that the conjugation reaction has no deleterious effects on antibody avidity. This study demonstrates that this assumption need not hold true and presents a methodology to quantitatively determine the degree of inactivation and/or changes in antibody-antigen binding that can occur with conjugation. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) was conjugated to a mouse monoclonal antibody, Fc125, against hemagglutinin (HA) using varying fluorophore/protein (F:P) labeling ratios. Antibody binding, as a function of the F:P labeling ratio, was evaluated using a kinetic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and analyzed using global fitting. A two-parameter adjustment of the antibody concentration and the maximum rate was sufficient to describe the rate changes. The concentration parameter dominated the rate changes, consistent with the hypothesis that the coupling reaction inactivated an increasing fraction of the antibody population with a smaller change (similar to 15% at the highest F:P ratio) in antibody-antigen binding. An optimal F:P ratio that minimized both inactivation and unlabeled antibody was calculated. This procedure can be used to prepare functional, labeled antibody reagents with defined activity and can aid in quantitative applications where the stoichiometry and functionality of the labeled antibody are critical. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available