4.7 Article

Spectroscopic characterization of hydroxylated nanoballs in methanol

Journal

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 46, Issue 15, Pages 5904-5910

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ic062268i

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this report, the photophysical properties of self-assembled [Cu-2(5-OH-bdc)(2)L-2](12) [where (5-OH-bdc)(2-) = 5-hydroxybenzene-1,3-dicarboxylate and L is a dimethyl sulfoxide, methanol, or water ligand] hydroxylated nanoballs (OH-nanoball) were examined in methanol using optical absorption and steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence methods. The optical spectrum of the OH-nanoball is dominated by ligand absorbance at 305 nm and a weaker Cu2+-to-ligand charge-transfer transition at similar to 695 nm, which are distinct from the absorption of either the free ligand (similar to 312 nm) or Cu2+(NO3)(2) (> 750 nm) in methanol. The corresponding emission spectrum of the OH-nanoball originates from the emission of the ligand and is centered at similar to 360 nm with a shoulder at similar to 390 nm. The emission from the OH-nanoball is significantly quenched relative to the free ligand [Phi(5-OH-H2bdc) = 0.014 and Phi(OH-nanoball) = (5.6 +/- 0.5) x 10(-5)]. The addition of bases such as imidazole results in an increase in the emission intensity of the OH-nanoball solution, indicating dissociation of the [Cu-2(5-OH-bdc)(2)L-2](12) units. Although the mechanism of (5-OH-bdc)(2-) quenching within the OH-nanoball is not clear, it is likely due to interactions between the ligand pi system and the Cu d orbitals. Fluorescence polarization studies further suggest that the OH-nanoball retains a spherical shape in solution. This is evident by the fact that the fluorescence anisotropy of the nanoball is nearly identical with that of the free ligand, suggesting rapid energy transfer (homogeneous fluorescence resonance energy transfer) between ligands within the OH-nanoball.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available