4.6 Article

Inflammatory signaling pathways regulating ApoE gene expression in macrophages

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 282, Issue 30, Pages 21776-21785

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M611422200

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The atheroprotective role of apolipoprotein E (apoE) is well established. During inflammation, expression of apoE in macrophages is reduced leading to enhanced atheromatous plaque development. In the present study, we investigated the signaling pathways involved in the repression of apoE gene expression in response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) treatment, a condition that mimics the inflammatory stress, in mouse macrophages RAW 264.7. We identified Tpl-2 and MEKK1 as the kinases that are primarily responsible for the down-regulation of apoE promoter activity by LPS. Using a dominant negative form of I kappa B, we established that Tpl-2 and MEKK1 signaling pathways converge to NF-kappa B acting on the apoE core promoter -55/+73. In addition to NF-kappa B activation, LPS also activated c-Jun via its phosphorylation by JNK. The activity of the apoE promoter was repressed by c-Jun, whereas small interference RNA-mediated inhibition of endogenous c-Jun expression reversed the inhibitory effect of Tpl-2 on the apoE promoter. Transfection experiments and DNA binding assays showed that the binding site for c-Jun is in the -55/+73 region of the apoE promoter. Finally, we showed that LPS inhibited apoE gene expression via activation of the Tpl-2/MEK/ERK pathway acting on a different apoE promoter region. In summary, LPS represses apoE gene expression in macrophages via signaling pathways that involve the upstream kinases Tpl-2 and MEKK1, the intermediate mitogenactivated protein kinases ERK and JNK, and the downstream transcription factors AP-1 and NF-kappa B that inhibit the apoE promoter activity via distinct regions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available