4.5 Article

A comparative analysis of leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (Lrrk2) expression in mouse brain and Lewy body disease

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 147, Issue 4, Pages 1047-1058

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.05.027

Keywords

Lrrk2; immunohistochemistry; Parkinson's disease; Lewy body; subventricular zone; neurogenesis

Categories

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [P50 NS40256] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pathogenic substitutions in leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2, Lrrk2) have been genetically linked to familial, late-onset Parkinsonism. End-stage disease is predominantly associated with nigral neuronal loss and Lewy body pathology, but patients may have gliosis, tau or ubiquitin inclusions (pleomorphic pathology). The anatomical distribution of Lrrk2 protein may provide insight into its function in health and neurodegeneration, thus we performed a comparative study with 'in-house' and commercially available Lrrk2 antibodies using brain tissue from wild type and human Lrrk2 transgenic bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) mice, and from diffuse Lewy body disease (DLBD) patients. Lrrk2 protein was ubiquitously expressed and relatively abundant in most brain regions, including the substantia nigra, thalamus and striatum. Lrrk2 was not a major component of Lewy body or neuritic pathology associated with Parkinson's disease. However, selective loss of dopaminergic neurons in Lrrk2-associated Parkinsonism argues the protein may have regional-specific interactions. Lrrk2 immunohistochemical staining was present in the subventricular zone, a region containing stem cells that give rise to both neurons and glia. A role for Lrrk2 in neurogenesis might provide further insight into the aberrant role of mutant protein in age-associated neurodegeneration with pleomorphic pathology. (C) 2007 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available