4.6 Article

Evidence of large rainfall partitioning patterns by banana and impact on surface runoff generation

Journal

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
Volume 21, Issue 16, Pages 2196-2205

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6588

Keywords

rainfall interception; stemflow; banana plant; Andosol; runoff; infiltration rate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article the effect of redistribution of rainfall by banana on local water fluxes and the possible impact of these fluxes on surface runoff has been studied. First the water redistribution by a banana canopy at three development stages (vegetative, flowering, and bunch stage) was measured. The results showed a considerable stemflow, proportional to the leaf area index (LAI), which represented 18 to 26% of the incident rainfall volume according to the age of the crop. Consequently, the rainfall rate was 28-fold higher at the plant collar for a fully developed banana canopy. For the throughfall, on average, the higher the LAI, the lower the mean throughfall. In addition, the spatial distribution of the throughfall varied according to the distance from the pseudostem. Notably, for the earlier stages, the area between the pseudostem and 0.5 m from it received weak throughfall. Secondly, simulations were carried out with a simple two-compartment model simulating the total surface runoff volume. The simulations showed stemflow combined with the agronomical practice of furrowing has an effect on runoff compared to bare soil. A relative increase in surface runoff volume of three-fold was encountered on a plot with a fully developed banana and a infiltration rate of 60 mm h(-1). However, the absolute increase was only a few percentage of the incident rainfall volume, although it represented large water volumes given the tropical rains. These features must be taken into account for hydrological management of such systems. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available