4.3 Article

Obstetric outcome of twin pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization and ovulation induction compared with those conceived spontaneously

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.08.010

Keywords

in vitro fertilization; ovulation induction; obstetric complications; neonatal complications; gestational diabetes mellitus; twins

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To compare the obstetric characteristics of twin pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization (IVF) and ovulation induction with those conceived spontaneously. Design: Case control study. Setting. Tertiary Medical Center. Patients: All twin deliveries that were achieved by IVF (n = 558) and ovulation induction (n = 478) from January 1988 through December 2002 were evaluated. Each group was compared with a control group that conceived spontaneously (n = 3694) and was delivered during the same period. Interventions: Ovulation induction, IVF-ET. Main outcome ineasures: Obstetrical complications. Results.- Multivariate analysis showed that patients who conceived with the assistance of WE and ovulation induction had a significantly higher risk for gestational diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR] = 2.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.77-3.29 and OR = 1.71, Cl = 1.2-2.42, respectively), cesarean section (OR = 2.17, 95% Cl = 1.74-2.70 and OR = 1.76, Cl = 1.43-2.16, respectively), and a lower gestational age at birth in the WE group (OR = 0.91, 95% Cl = 0.88-0.94), compared with their controls. Conclusions: After controlling for maternal age, and nulliparity we demonstrated that twin pregnancies conceived with the assistance of WE and ovulation induction are at increased risk for gestational diabetes mellitus, and delivery by cesarean section. In addition, IVF conceived pregnancies have a lower gestational age at birth. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available